Thursday, March 22, 2012

Journal #4

#4 What conclusions does Mersault come to at the end of the novel. Does Camus want the reader to come to the same conclusions?

At the end of the novel, Meursault comes to the conclusion that nothing really matters and it is up to the individual to do as he or she pleases. Much of his thoughts are seen during his final meeting with the chaplain. Since everyone eventually dies, when and how does not matter. He spurts out a series of questions asking their importance but comes to the conclusion that none of it really mattered. When told that everyone in his position had turned to God before being executed, he acknowledges the fact but refuses to conform to the common decision. He simply does not care about what others think and only sees his beliefs as the right choice. He claims he does not have the time to interest himself in what does not interest him, showing the concept of the individual.
I think Camus does not really care whether the same conclusions are reached but rather that people and society are aware and able to acknowledge these beliefs. As it appears in the novel, many of the ideas presented are not accepted by society but Camus holds onto these ideas through Meursault. Even when faced with death, the questions of whether there is meaning is brought up, showing the strong hold on the beliefs.

No comments:

Post a Comment